Thursday, July 23, 2026

An Overview of Small Business Contracting

July 21, 2026, the Congressional Research Service released R45576 An Overview of Small Business Contracting.

Abbreviatons in this report:

  • Small businesses owned by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals (SDBs),

    Women-owned small businesses (WOSBs),

    Small businesses located within a HUBZone, and

    Service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses (SDVOSBs).

    Congress has broad authority to impact the federal procurement process and how agencies purchase goods and services from private sector firms. One way in which Congress has exercised this authority is by adopting measures to promote contracts and subcontracts with "small businesses." This report discusses federal contracting preferences for firms that meet the Small Business Administration's definition of "small." It also provides information on statutory and regulatory requirements for agencies to award contracts to small businesses, as well as federal assistance for small business owners seeking government contracts.

    Small business contracting policies and programs respond to the congressional directive to ensure that a "fair proportion" of federal contract and subcontract dollars is awarded to small businesses. Congress established government-wide goals for the percentage of federal contract and subcontract dollars awarded to small businesses each fiscal year. The Small Business Administration (SBA) negotiates small business procurement goals with each federal agency, negotiating agency-specific goals that collectively add up to the government-wide goals in statute. The SBA publishes annual Small Business Procurement Scorecards and the System for Awards Management (SAM.gov) posts an annual Small Business Goaling Report, which measure goal achievement.

    There are procurement goals for both prime and subcontract dollars for small businesses, small businesses owned by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals (SDBs), women-owned small businesses (WOSBs), small businesses located within a HUBZone, and service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses (SDVOSBs). In recent years, the government has generally succeeded in meeting the government-wide goals for awards made to small businesses, SDBs, and SDVOSBs. It has also met its subcontracting goals for small businesses and WOSBs. It has had difficulty meeting the WOSB and HUBZone prime contracting goals.

    A collection of laws and regulations underpin small business contracting efforts. To facilitate contracting opportunities for small businesses, Congress has authorized federal agencies, under specified circumstances, to set aside contracts exclusively for small businesses; authorized federal agencies to make sole-source awards to small businesses; and authorized federal agencies to set aside contracts for, or grant other contracting preferences to, the four types of small businesses for which there are small business procurement goals: SDBs, SDVOSBs, WOSBs, and HUBZone firms. Congress tasks the SBA and agency procurement personnel with reviewing and structuring proposed procurements to maximize opportunities for small business participation.

    Also supporting small businesses in the federal market are technical assistance providers, small business contractor mentor-protégé programs, and subcontracting policies and regulations.

    Observers may judge the relative success or failure of federal efforts to create small business contracting opportunities by whether the government and individual agencies meet small business procurement goals. The publication of goal attainment data and SBA Procurement Scorecards offer an accessible way to examine the level of small business contracting each year but may focus reviewers on readily measured information (dollars awarded) rather than broader assessments of the effectiveness of contracting programs and policies. Moreover, the procurement goals themselves may not reflect overall policy aims, because of how they are expressed by monetary value, and/or because of how high or low they are relative to the availability of small suppliers. Other valuable information might include measures of market diversification, competitiveness, or concentration. Issues of interest to Congress include regulatory initiatives and defense acquisition reform legislation.

    The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, increased the SDVOSB goal from 3% to 5%.

SOURCES SOUGHT - U.S. Army West Point India White Coats, Trousers, Dresses

July 23, 2026, SOURCES SOUGHT - U.S. Army West Point India White Coats, Trousers, Dresses.

The U.S. Government desires to procure for the West Point Cadet Uniform factory; India White Coats, Trousers, Dresses on a base plus four (4) one (1) option year contract as a small business set-aside basis, provided 2 or more qualified small businesses respond to the sources sought notice with information sufficient to support a set-aside.

See: SAM Notification.

Procurement List Deletions

On July 23, 2026, the Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published in the Federal Register (91 FR 46414) Deletions.

8415-01-515-4662--Cover, Advanced Combat Helmet, Reversible, Woodland/Desert Camouflage, S/M

8415-01-515-4663--Cover, Advanced Combat Helmet, Reversible, Woodland/Desert Camouflage, L/XL

8415-01-592-2218--Cover, Advanced Combat Helmet, No Comm Flap, OEFCP, S/M

8415-01-592-2220--Cover, Advanced Combat Helmet, No Comm Flap, OEFCP, L/XL

8415-01-F-05-2290--Cover, Enhanced Combat Helmet, Operational Camouflage Pattern--6 Color, L/XL

8415-01-F-05-2291--Cover, Enhanced Combat Helmet, Operational Camouflage Pattern--6 Color, XXL

8415-01-F-05-2292--Cover, Enhanced Combat Helmet, Operational Camouflage Pattern--6 Color, S/M

Procurement List: Proposed Deletions

On July 23, 2026, the Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published in the Federal Register (91 FR 46413) Proposed Deletions.

8455-01-698-8429--Face Mask Lanyard, Black, 36'' x \3/8\'' with Breakaway

8470-01-092-8492--Headband, Helmet, Ground Troop/Parachutists, XS

8470-01-092-8493--Headband, Helmet, Ground Troop/Parachutists, S/M/L

8470-01-303-8946--Heaband, Helmet, Ground Troop/Parachutists, XL

8470-01-526-8462--Headband, PASGT, XS/S

8470-01-526-8463--Headband, Ground Troops and Parachutists Helmet, Foliage Green

8470-01-526-8464--Headband, PASGT, L/XL

Wednesday, July 22, 2026

Rogers Applauds House Passage of the FY27 NDAA

July 22, 2026, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-AL) released a statement today praising the House passage of H.R. 8800, The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27 NDAA).

Read the press release HERE.

The vote was largely along party lines.

Seven Republicans voted Nay:

  1. Brecheen of Oklahoma
  2. Burchett of Tennessee
  3. Crane of Arizona
  4. Hageman of Wyoming
  5. Luna of Florida
  6. Massie of Kentuck
  7. Roy of Texas

Six Democrats voted Yae

  1. Cuellar of Texas
  2. Davis of North Carolina
  3. Golden of Maine
  4. Gonzalez, V. of Texas
  5. Gray of California
  6. Perez of Washington

Plate Carrier Maritime Vests for Foreign Military Sales

July 22, 2026, The U.S. Army Contracting Command-Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG), an agency of the Government, intends to procure Maritime Vests in support of the U.S. Army Security Assistance Command (USASAC). The Government anticipates the issuance of a commercial, Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract, in accordance with (IAW) FAR 13.106, as a result of the subject Combined Synopsis/solicitation for the procurement of Berry Compliant Maritime Vests (Plate carrier) for Maritime operations.

Within the U.S. industry it is widely understood that Department of Defense acquisitions of textiles and clothing are government by the Berry Amendment which requires domestic U.S. sourcing. Less well known is that the Berry Amendment applies to all funds "made available" to the Defense Department. That includes Department of Defense procurement for Foreign Military Sales.

See SAM Notification.

NDAA Update: Textiles

On July 21, 2026, the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 8800 as unfinished business.

On June 15, 2026, the Committee of the Whole House published H.Rept. 119-698 to accompany H.R. 8800, the National Defense Authorization Act for 2027.

Page 450, Berry Amendment and Buy American Requirements for Defense Textiles.

The committee reaffirms the critical importance of the Berry Amendment (section 4862 of title 10, United States Code) and Buy American requirements in sustaining a secure and resilient domestic defense textile and apparel industrial base. The committee recognizes that Berry-compliant manufacturers are foundational to military readiness and that the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support (DLA-TS) serves as the Department of Defense's primary procuring activity for uniforms, protective equipment, and other mission-essential organizational clothing and individual equipment items.

The committee notes that DLA-TS contracting practices play a central role in compliance with domestic sourcing requirements and providing predictable demand signals to domestic manufacturers. Accordingly, the committee expects DLA-TS to rigorously enforce Berry Amendment and Buy American requirements for all covered textile and apparel procurements to protect the domestic industrial base.

Therefore, the committee directs the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in coordination with the Director of the Defense Logistics Agency, to provide a briefing to the House Committee on Armed Services not later than March 31, 2027, on efforts to strengthen compliance with the Berry Amendment and Buy American requirements for textile and apparel items. The briefing shall include:

(1) an assessment of waiver usage;

(2) an evaluation of supplier verification and auditing practices;

(3) steps taken to improve transparency and traceability across the textile supply chain; and

(4) actions to align contracting strategies with the long-term health of the domestic defense textile industrial base.

Page 459 Expansion of Domestic Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Production Capacity

The committee remains concerned about documented capacity shortfalls in the domestic ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fiber industrial base. There are concerns that domestic UHMWPE production may be insufficient to meet national security requirements under surge conditions. There is also the possibility that facility utilization may exceed 100 percent as early as fiscal year 2026. Therefore, the committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide a briefing to the House Committee on Armed Services not later than March 1, 2027, on the Department's strategy to address UHMWPE fiber capacity shortfalls. The briefing shall include the following:

(1) an assessment of current and projected UHMWPE fiber requirements across all services for soft armor vests, hard armor plates, ballistic helmets, and vehicle protection systems through fiscal year 2030;

(2) an evaluation of domestic manufacturing capacity gaps and the Department's plan to achieve capacity sufficient to meet 100 percent of requirements plus 30 percent surge capacity;

(3) the advisability of designating UHMWPE fiber as a critical material under Defense Production Act Title I authorities;

(4) the status of Berry Amendment compliance among domestic UHMWPE suppliers and the availability of PFAS-free armor solutions; and

(5) any legislative authorities required to achieve capacity targets or address industrial base vulnerabilities.

Page 460 Flame Resistant Textile Industrial Base.

The committee notes that maintaining a stabilized flame-resistant technical textile industrial base is critical to the Department of the Army's ability to support overseas operations, Large Scale Combat Operations (LCSO), and Defense Support of Civil Authorities.

Additionally, the committee recognizes the 2024 Defense Logistics Agency CAMOLAND Clothing and Textile Industrial Base Wargame Report concluded that any disruption to the supply chain that supports the production of combat uniforms would compromise the already weakened clothing and textile industrial base's ability to produce flame-resistant military uniforms during surge conditions. As such, the committee considers rapidly improving the resilience and production capacity of this segment of the defense industrial base as imperative.

Therefore, the committee directs the Secretary of the Army to provide a briefing to the House Committee on Armed Services not later than January 31, 2027, that includes the following:

(1) a 5-year notional budget to stabilize the flame-resistant textile industrial base;

(2) an assessment of wider distribution of the flame-resistant military uniform to soldiers exposed to enhanced thermal risk both domestically and overseas; and

(3) estimated flame resistant uniform procurement costs, usage rates, and surge requirements needed to support LCSO.

The committee reaffirms its long-term support for the Department of Defense's commitment to giving preference in procurement to domestically produced fabrics, including American-made military uniforms, as required by the Berry Amendment. The committee notes that it has received reports of Army Green Service Uniforms (AGSU) being offered to Active Duty soldiers and Army Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) cadets for use in official military duties that are not Berry Amendment compliant and have not been certified by the U.S. Army Natick Soldier Systems Center as required by AR 670-1. The committee is concerned that, if these reports are accurate, future officers may begin their service wearing uncertified, unauthorized, and visibly different uniforms from those produced under the Army's Uniform Quality Control Program. The committee is also concerned that the importation of uncertified, foreign-made uniforms could undermine authorized manufacturers and erode the domestic industrial base.

Therefore, the committee directs the Secretary of the Army, in coordination with Army Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 (Personnel) and the Natick Soldier Systems Center, to provide a briefing to the House Committee on Armed Services not later than June 1, 2027, on: (1) the prevalence and scope of imported, uncertified AGSU uniforms being offered by outside vendors on military installations and ROTC programs; (2) current requirements for Berry Amendment certification of Army uniforms; (3) the current process for inspecting and ensuring soldier-owned uniforms are Berry-compliant and authorized for official use; and (4) any recommendations for additional instructions or guidance, such as an All Army Activities or similar directive, to ensure that only certified uniform items are authorized.

Page 461 Imported Army Uniforms

The committee reaffirms its long-term support for the Department of Defense's commitment to giving preference in procurement to domestically produced fabrics, including American-made military uniforms, as required by the Berry Amendment. The committee notes that it has received reports of Army Green Service Uniforms (AGSU) being offered to Active Duty soldiers and Army Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) cadets for use in official military duties that are not Berry Amendment compliant and have not been certified by the U.S. Army Natick Soldier Systems Center as required by AR 670-1. The committee is concerned that, if these reports are accurate, future officers may begin their service wearing uncertified, unauthorized, and visibly different uniforms from those produced under the Army's Uniform Quality Control Program. The committee is also concerned that the importation of uncertified, foreign-made uniforms could undermine authorized manufacturers and erode the domestic industrial base.

Therefore, the committee directs the Secretary of the Army, in coordination with Army Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 (Personnel) and the Natick Soldier Systems Center, to provide a briefing to the House Committee on Armed Services not later than June 1, 2027, on: (1) the prevalence and scope of imported, uncertified AGSU uniforms being offered by outside vendors on military installations and ROTC programs; (2) current requirements for Berry Amendment certification of Army uniforms; (3) the current process for inspecting and ensuring soldier-owned uniforms are Berry-compliant and authorized for official use; and (4) any recommendations for additional instructions or guidance, such as an All Army Activities or similar directive, to ensure that only certified uniform items are authorized.

Page 466 Promoting American-made Textiles

The committee recognizes that untangling American supply chains from adversarial nations is a priority of Congress and the Department of Defense, specifically in the domain of goods used for the U.S. military. In service of supporting the domestic textile industrial base and leveraging partnerships with allied nations, section 865 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 (P.L. 119-60) provides allowable investments for the Textile Automation to Enhance Domestic Military Production program and directly supports the domestic military production and industrial base for textiles and footwear.

To further expand efforts aimed at securing domestic supply chains and revitalizing American industries essential to national security and economic growth, the committee directs the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment to submit a report to the House Committee on Armed Services not later than January 1, 2027, which includes the following:

(1) an assessment of the feasibility of narrowing the exception for Berry Amendment small purchases from $150,000 to $20,000, both broadly and specifically for textiles;

(2) a status update on efforts by the Department of Defense to implement Section 865 of Public Law 119-60; and

(3) any proposed strategies for strengthening the Berry Amendment and countering malign actors, including the People's Republic of China, as they seek to contaminate textile supply chains for U.S. military uniforms.