In order to
get a patent, an invention has to be useful, novel and not obvious. In the US, the useful standard is pretty
simple to meet: for all intents and
purposes the invention has to do something.
The arguments in getting a patent generally come down to novelty and
obviousness.
To determine
novelty and obviousness, the patent examiner will perform a “prior art” search
to determine if the invention’s concept has been previously disclosed. As a part of the process, the examiner will generate
references to patents and publications for closely related concepts and
inventions and then use these references to argue against issuing a patent for
the application.
It is always
best for an applicant to have a patent search done before filing an
application. Not only does the search
help to determine whether it is worth filing for the patent, but by having some
idea of what the examiner is going to find it is often possible to write
applications around potential conflicts with prior art.
There are
several companies that do patent searches and I strongly encourage inventors to
use them. A proper search generally
requires an understanding of the US Patent Classification System, the
Cooperative Patent Classification System, knowledge of some pretty detailed
search techniques and, in order to be efficient, access to expensive
databases. And then, once you have
cleared these obstacles and found the patents, the inventor still has to read
and evaluate the patents. The truth is
that even a low end patent search will give you better results than what inventors
can do for themselves.
Fortunately,
there appears to be a good bit of competition among patent search
companies. Patent search costs are a
function of the subject matter and the complexity of the invention. A patent search for a simple mechanical
invention will usually cost less than $1,000 from a high end company and will
probably cost under $500 from lesser prestigious companies. Simple chemical and electrical searches will
start around $1500 from the better firms.
Even from
the best companies, patent searches are not perfect. They will miss references that the examiners
will find. This is because patent
examiners are very good at what they do.
They are experts in their fields with a lot of experience, access to the
best internal and external databases, and, as employees of the USPTO, they have
the support of an institution that has been doing this sort of work for over
200 years. Applicants need to expect that
examiners will find some unexpected references.
Below is a summary of selected patents that have been
recently issued in textile related classification codes:
Wear-resistant
outsole: A shoe sole
with a perimeter made of a harder elastomeric material than the material used
to form the traction elements that form the inner protion of the sole. Patent: 8671592. Invenor: Dojan.
Assignee: Nike, Inc.
Lightweight and flexible
article of footwear: A shoe an outer member including slots
and an inner plate with protective strips that increases flexibility for the
wearer. Patent: 8671593. Inventor: Becker, et.al. Assignee:
Nike, Inc.
Article of
footwear with traction members having a low profile sole: Cleat arrangement for a golf shoe.
Patent:
8671594. Inventor: Ortley and Grott. Assignee:
Taylor Made Golf Incorporated.
Ornamentation for a footwear upper.
An ornament that can be attached to a shoe strap or shoelace. Patent:
8671595. Inventor: Nelson.
Not Assigned.
Drawing frame for
a spinning machine: A drawing frame
head that is detachable from the spinning frame. This is clearly intended to simplify
maintenance but the spinning machine may also be able operate without the
head. Patent:
8671657. Inventor:
Malina. Assignee: Maschinenfabrik
Rieter Ag
Self-expanding pseudo-braided
intravascular device: A self-expanding, pseudo-braided device
embodying a high expansion ratio and flexibility as well as comformability and
improved radial force. The pseudo-braided device is particularly suited for
advancement through and deployment within highly tortuous and very distal
vasculature. Various forms of the pseudo-braided device are adapted for the
repair of aneurysms and stenoses as well as for use in thrombectomies and
embolic protection therapy.Patent: 8671815.
Inventor: Hancock et.al. Assignee:
Abbot Vascular Solutions Inc.
Braiding device for
catheter having acuately varying pullwires:
A braider for
braiding wires to a tube comprising an iris assembly having stacked iris
plates.. The braider includes a feeder assembly configured for advancing the
tube through the center apertures and a braiding assembly configured for
braiding a plurality of filaments around the tube and the plurality of wires as
they are fed through the iris assembly. Patent: 8671817. Inventor: Bogusky.
Assignee: Hanson Medical Inc.
System for
adjusting the fit of a bra to a wearer's bosom:
A system for
adjusting the fit of a bra includes a bra having cups, a bridge and an
underwire channel sewn beneath each cup. The underwire residing in each channel
is bendable along at least one axis, can be lengthened, and is capable of
retaining its adjusted shape after being adjusted. Patent: 8672727. Inventor: LaRoux.
Not Assigned.
Jim Carson is a
principal of RB Consulting, Inc. and a registered patent agent. He has over 30 years of experience
across multiple industries including the biotechnology, textile, computer,
telecommunications, and energy sectors. RB
Consulting, Inc. specializes in providing management, prototyping, and
regulatory services to small and start-up businesses. He can be reached via email at James.Carson.Jr@gmail.com or by phone at (803) 792-2183.
No comments:
Post a Comment